Tita v. State - CCA
The State was not obligated at trial to prove that its prosecution of the
defendant was not barred by the statute of limitations. At the trial stage, the defendant moved twice for an instructed verdict of acquittal but never requested a jury instruction on the statute of limitations defense. Tita v. State - PD-1574-07.
defendant was not barred by the statute of limitations. At the trial stage, the defendant moved twice for an instructed verdict of acquittal but never requested a jury instruction on the statute of limitations defense. Tita v. State - PD-1574-07.
