Ahmad v. State
In the defendant's trial for possession of a hoax bomb, the first
grand jury indictment alleging that the defendant buried a training
bomb tolled limitations with regard to a second indictment alleging that
she made a false report about a bomb and possessed a hoax bomb. Both indictments stem from the defendant's possession of, and
report about some kind of bomb-hoax, training or unspecified. If prior
and subsequent indictments charge different offenses but those offenses
arise from the same conduct, the prior indictment tolls the statute of
limitations.
