Weekly Case Summaries: January 7, 2011

Texas Courts of Appeals

$27,877.00 v. State - 2nd COA

12/23/10 : Cite No. 02-10-00035-CV

Issue:

Did the Carrollton police lawfully search a residence outside their city limits but within the same county?

Holding:

Yes. As a home rule municipality, the police had countywide jurisdiction so they could both obtain a search warrant and execute it within the same county. Read Opinion.

Commentary:

A good, if somewhat geeky, review of home-rule v. general-law municipalities and relevant peace officer jurisdiction. But the real value of this case is the description of an unusually thorough asset forfeiture investigation. Three search warrants, a recorded jail phone call and multiple dog sniffing paid off with a valid and sufficient seizure of drug proceeds. Judge Dauphinot, as she often does, dissents, and gets quite carried away in focusing way too much on the meaning of the dog sniffs. There was plenty of other corroborating evidence to show the money came from drug dealing.

State v. Smith - 3rd COA

12/23/10 : Cite No. 03-09-00537-CR (not published)

Issue:

Did the trial court incorrectly exclude the State expert's testimony on retrograde extrapolation?

Holding:

No. While the State submitted data at the suppression hearing, it failed to present any expert testimony employing those facts in a retrograde extrapolation analysis. Also, a defense expert testified that retrograde extrapolation could not be reliably performed on this record. Read Opinion.

Commentary:

A bit baffling. The court of appeals notes that the State, in what apparently was a strategic decision, declined to present any testimony. The court of appeals also politely points out that the Defendant did present expert testimony supporting exclusion. And, in a somewhat sheepish tone, the court of appeals points out the obvious conclusion that the trial court, faced with such a record, had no choice but to exclude the evidence. Perhaps next time the State will get in the game. (By the way, there is a serious question as to whether a pretrial hearing, when not focused on a search, seizure or confession issue, is the appropriate mechanism for testing the admissibility of evidence. Kind of seems like a trial before the trial.)

TDCAA is pleased to offer our members unique case summaries from the U.S. Supreme Court, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Texas Courts of Appeals and the Texas Attorney General. In addition to the basic summaries, each case will have a link to the full text opinion and will offer exclusive prosecutor commentary explaining how the case may impact you as a prosecutor. The case summaries are for the benefit of prosecutors, their staff members, and members of the law enforcement community. These summaries are NOT a source of legal advice for citizens. The information contained in this email message may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized use, printing, copying, disclosure, dissemination of or reliance upon this communication by persons other than the intended recipient may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please email comments, problems, or questions to casesummary@tdcaa.com. In addition, if you would like to discuss the summaries with fellow prosecutors, look for the thread in our criminal forum.