The defendant's confrontation clause rights were not violated by allowing a child witness to testify by closed-circuit television. The state established that the witness would be unavailable to testify under CCP art. 38.071 [1] because he would suffer undue psychological or physical harm through his involvement in the trial. In addition, the defendant had the opportunity to cross-examine the witness via CCTV. Gaitan v. State, 2-06-399-CR [2].