Weekly Case Summaries: February 23, 2018

Texas Attorney General Opinions

Opinion KP-0180              2/15/18


May a county commissioners court deny a county judge longevity pay due to receipt of a state salary supplement pursuant to Gov’t Code §26.006?


Gov’t Code §26.006(c) does not preclude a county policy that excludes a county judge who receives a state salary supplement from receiving longevity pay paid to other officers and employees, provided the policy does not effectively reduce the county judge’s salary to offset the county judge’s state salary supplement. Read opinion.


One wonders why else a county would reduce a county judge’s salary under such circumstances. In any event, the opinion also cites to §41.255 of the Government Code, which prevents a county from reducing an assistant prosecutor’s salary to offset the longevity pay supplement. It would seem that this opinion regarding the county judge would also apply by analogy to assistant prosecutors.


TV show “Criminal Confessions” is looking for Texas cases to be featured in their second season. For more information and how to get in touch with the producers, visit our site.

TDCAA is pleased to offer these unique case summaries from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the Texas Supreme Court, the Texas Courts of Appeals and the Texas Attorney General. In addition to the basic summaries, each case will have a link to the full text opinion and will offer exclusive prosecutor commentary explaining how the case may impact you as a prosecutor. The case summaries are for the benefit of prosecutors, their staff members, and members of the law enforcement community. These summaries are NOT a source of legal advice for citizens. The commentaries expressed in these case summaries are not official statements by TDCAA and do not represent the opinions of TDCAA, its staff, or any member of the association. Please email comments, problems, or questions to [email protected].