Weekly Case Summaries: July 6, 2018

Texas Courts of Appeals

Hinojosa v. State

No. 01-16-00516-CR                         6/28/18

Issues:

Is the failure to obtain a written waiver of a jury trial constitutional error requiring reversal? Is the evidence insufficient to prove venue in a continuous sexual abuse case when the indictment alleges one county, but the evidence shows that the predicate offenses occurred in multiple counties?

Holding:

No. Neither the Texas nor United States Constitutions require a jury trial waiver to be written. Although Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 1.13 does require a waiver to be written, failure to comply with the statute is only statutory error, not constitutional error. Statutory error is disregarded unless the error affected the defendant’s substantial rights. Failure to obtain a written jury waiver does not affect the defendant’s substantial rights if the record reflects that the defendant knew he had the right to a jury trial and knowingly waived that right. Here, the failure to obtain a written jury waiver was harmless because the judgment stated that the defendant waived his right to a jury trial. Additionally, venue is not an element of the offense for purposes of evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, and the continuous sexual abuse statute does not require that the predicate offenses be committed in the same county. Read opinion.

Commentary:

The jury waiver issue is consistent with existing precedent. The sufficiency of the evidence issue will be useful because the multi-county situation is very common in sexual abuse cases, and prosecutors handling these cases can never be sure what the victim will testify to until it happens on the stand.

TDCAA is pleased to offer these unique case summaries from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the Texas Supreme Court, the Texas Courts of Appeals and the Texas Attorney General. In addition to the basic summaries, each case will have a link to the full text opinion and will offer exclusive prosecutor commentary explaining how the case may impact you as a prosecutor. The case summaries are for the benefit of prosecutors, their staff members, and members of the law enforcement community. These summaries are NOT a source of legal advice for citizens. The commentaries expressed in these case summaries are not official statements by TDCAA and do not represent the opinions of TDCAA, its staff, or any member of the association. Please email comments, problems, or questions to [email protected].